Why Earth needs a Space Elevator

Since the dawn of the space age, climbing toward the stars has required a breathtaking amount of rocket fuel, making trips into space both expensive and dangerous.


Science fiction is the province of big dreams, and few dreams are bigger than our planet's very own stairway to heaven, the space elevator. This grand idea offers the promise of safe, inexpensive trips into orbit (and back!) on a daily basis. The space elevator was popularized by science fiction author Arthur C. Clarke in the novel Fountains of Paradise, and also plays a bit part in this month's book selection, Old Man's War.

The most surprising part of the idea: it's not as crazy as it sounds.

Jack and the GEO-Beanstalk

So how does it work? An anchor would be positioned in geostationary orbit, then connected to a base platform on Earth using a ribbon of ultra-strong carbon nanotubes. Mechanical lifters would climb up and down the ribbon, dropping the cost from today's $20,000 per kilogram to perhaps $100/kg. From How Stuff Works:

To better understand the concept of a space elevator, think of the game tetherball in which a rope is attached at one end to a pole and at the other to a ball. In this analogy, the rope is the carbon nanotubes composite ribbon, the pole is the Earth and the ball is the counterweight. Now, imagine the ball is placed in perpetual spin around the pole, so fast that it keeps the rope taut. This is the general idea of the space elevator. The counterweight spins around the Earth, keeping the cable straight and allowing the robotic lifters to ride up and down the ribbon.

Here's a short space elevator video (< 2 min.) to demonstrate the basic principles:


Why on Earth do we need one?

Construction of a space elevator would be a monumental undertaking, in terms of time as well as cost. So what benefits would we see from one? Here are some broad categories, from the frivolous to weighty:
  • Entertainment & tourism. With multi-millionaires paying exorbitant fees to spend a few days on the cramped space station, space tourism is a no-brainer. There'd be incredible sightseeing, of course, but how about a null-gravity Olympics? Or a real-life version of the Battle Room from Ender's Game?

  • Resource exploitation. Should it suddenly become trivial to move equipment and materials up and down the gravity well, then the near solar system (the Moon, asteroid belt, etc.) is suddenly ripe with possibilities. And how about a research station with 24 hour access to solar energy...

  • Entrepreneurial innovation. Today's system of global commerce is largely the outgrowth of the trans-continental rail and highway systems. Who knows what might happen if we apply the free market engines of creation to the orbital plane? A space elevator could realign our relationship with outer space and transform the global economy.

  • Exploration & colonization. During NASA's trips to the moon, the vast majority of the payload was spent on fuel for the outgoing and return journeys. It becomes far more economical to send probes to the moon, Mars, and beyond using the trip up the space elevator as a sort of slingshot.
Space tourism is sexy, and the commercial promise of a space elevator can help justify the cost to voters and/or shareholders. But at the end of the day, our place in the cosmos is a tenuous one. With 100% of our species trapped on a single planet, we are a single asteroid strike or global pandemic away from extinction. The best long-term case for the space elevator, simply put: if humanity is to endure, we must escape the tyranny of Earth's gravity well and begin to settle the stars.

Objects in future may be closer than they appear

When asked when he thought the vision might become a reality, Arthur C. Clarke responded "fifty years after everyone stops laughing."

Luckily for the rest of us, a devoted cadre of scientists and engineers has not only stopped laughing, but dedicated their lives to making the space elevator a reality. A Space Elevator Conference was recently held in in Redmond, WA; additional conferences are planned in Japan and Europe. There is also a space elevator reference site, a space elevator blog, and a space elevator foundation.

The Bremerton, WA Liftport Group is the most commercially ambitious of the lot, with a countdown clock on their Web site marking time until their tentative launch date of October 27, 2031. Their site also has a FAQ that includes a fascinating section on potential threats to the space elevator such as space debris, extreme weather, and terrorism.

Would you like to know more? NOVA recently produced an informative and inspiring special on the space elevator. The clip below is about ten minutes long, and includes footage from a recent X-Prize event in New Mexico:



# # #
Other posts on Book Club for Old Man's War, by John Scalzi:

Military science fiction: books & more


Do you enjoy military science fiction? Exploring the personal, technological, and moral implications of inter-species warfare has long been a rich vein of material for sci-fi authors. If you enjoyed Old Man's War, you may also enjoy the following books:

  • Starship Troopers by Robert A. Heinlein - Hugo winner and grand-daddy of the subgenre, was also made into a (far, far goofier) movie in 1997. Every book mentioned here can trace its roots directly back to this seminal classic.

  • The Forever War by Joe Haldeman - Gritty, action-packed, and outstanding novel. Haldeman also wrote a follow-up called Forever Peace that wasn't a direct continuation, but does deal with many of the issues raised in the first book.

  • Armor by John Steakley - A "splatterpunk sci-fi tale of armoured suits, survival instincts, and millions of murderous aliens;" for my money, Armor is the best book of the lot. It certainly has the best action scenes, by far: dizzyingly choreographed and thoroughly adrenaline-pumping. It also does a poignant job of illustrating the maxim that war is indeed hell.

Military sci-fi has also provided a memorable setting for a long series of futuristic strategy games:
  • The 1992 computer game Dune 2 kicked off a frenzy of real-time strategy games that later led to Starcraft and the Command and Conquer: Red Alert series. The former was the better game, but it's worth taking a moment to remember the latter for its glorious silliness. As explained elsewhere, Red Alert "starts off with Einstein traveling back in time to assassinate Hitler. By the time we're finished, we have dolphin commandos, psychically-controlled giant squid, electricity-draining UFOs, psychic soldiers that set people on fire with their minds, cloning machines, teleporting commandos who erase their targets from space-time, and bear paratroopers." That's right: bear paratroopers. :)

  • Popular military sci-fi games today include Dawn of War and Supreme Commander, the latter by the creator of the renowned Total Annihilation series.
Finally, from the land of teevee:
  • Futurama, Vol. 2: "War is the H-Word" was probably the single best episode of the show's glorious run, standing on equal ground with any "best of" Simpsons episodes, too. Sadly, there are no video clips available online, due to Fox's hyper-vigilant lawyers. We'll have to settle instead for a long list of quotes from the episode. "War were declared!"
This list is far from comprehensive; feel free to share any of your favorites in the comments!

# # #
Other posts on Book Club for Old Man's War, by John Scalzi:

Consciousness transfers and brainboxes

I don't want to achieve immortality through my work. I want to achieve it through not dying.
— Woody Allen

A small but fervent clique of geeks and dreamers has long imagined a future in which people can upload their consciousness into a machine. In doing so, humanity would end-run our messy biological entropy and thus achieve immortality.

(Warning: The following contains a mild spoiler for Old Man's War)

The deus ex machina at the heart of Old Man's War offers this same dream, with a twist: the consciousness of an older citizen is transferred into a brand new body, rather than into a machine. Specifically, their brain pattern is transferred into an enhanced clones of themselves, grown in a vat (at an accelerated rate) for the day the enlistee is ready to begin their service in the Colonial Defense Forces.

On the surface it seems like a clever mortality dodge, but it glosses over certain crucial questions:
  • If your brain is recorded from one source of organic matter, then "uploaded" into another: is that still really you?
  • Is a transfer of consciousness from one physical body to another actually a transfer, or is it instead the destruction of one being and the creation of another?
Some mischievously pedantic scientists raised this same issue during the broadcast run of the original Star Trek series1. The transporter, they contended, was actually a device that committed mass murder.

Their argument went like this: If all of your matter is broken down and recorded in one place, then recreated in another place with all new matter, then that's not really you! Your new body might seem identical, down to the last molecule, and every aspect of your new self might look, feel, and work in exactly the same way — but that thinking and breathing being is a fundamentally new one. The old one and its constituent components have ceased to exist. The "you" that existed in a simultaneous progression since the moment of conception is now gone.

From a metaphysical perspective, this is problematic. To say the least.

The same goes for consciousness transfers, be they of the brain-to-brain kind as in Old Man's War, or the brain-to-machine kind of "brainbox" so feverishly longed for by certain Singularitarians.

Scalzi's simultaneous consciousness dodge

In order to skirt this issue and provide temporal continuity between the old consciousness and new consciousness, Scalzi has the brain transfer subjects in Old Man's War experience simultaneous awareness from both viewpoints (p.79). I'm willing to suspend my disbelief to a pretty great extent, but this actually pulled me out of the book. How are the brains supposedly linked? It's two separate brains, and they should be two separate consciousnesses, in the same way that twins are different organisms once they've separated from each other. Simultaneous awareness is a neat idea, and was probably fun to write, but it
distracted me enough to temporarily take me out of the story.

--
[1] - Later versions of Star Trek got around this by saying that the transporter "converted your matter to energy, transported it, then reassembled it into matter." Far-fetched though it may be, this workaround technically keeps "you" as a continuous being.

# # #
Other posts on Book Club for Old Man's War, by John Scalzi:

[SPOILERS] Old Man's War: open discussion

So, what did you think?

In addition to my favorable review, I'll post some extremely spoilerific details in the comments.

Again, don't click through to the comments unless you want to see SPOILERS (all future page numbers refer to the mass market paperback version of Old Man's War).

# # #
Other posts on Book Club for Old Man's War, by John Scalzi: